Ali Obfuscacija e-poštnega naslova dejansko preprečuje neželeno pošto?

Kazalo:

Video: Ali Obfuscacija e-poštnega naslova dejansko preprečuje neželeno pošto?

Video: Ali Obfuscacija e-poštnega naslova dejansko preprečuje neželeno pošto?
Video: Откосы на окнах из пластика 2024, Marec
Ali Obfuscacija e-poštnega naslova dejansko preprečuje neželeno pošto?
Ali Obfuscacija e-poštnega naslova dejansko preprečuje neželeno pošto?
Anonim
Mnogi ljudje obogatijo svoje e-poštne naslove - tipkate someguy (at) somedomain (dot) com, na primer - da se projicirajo iz bloka SPAM-a. Ali takšne tehnike obfuscation dejansko delujejo?
Mnogi ljudje obogatijo svoje e-poštne naslove - tipkate someguy (at) somedomain (dot) com, na primer - da se projicirajo iz bloka SPAM-a. Ali takšne tehnike obfuscation dejansko delujejo?

Današnja seja vprašanj in odgovorov nam je prisotna v SuperUserju, ki je razdeljena na Stack Exchange, skupino pogonskih skupin na spletnih straneh Q & A.

Vprašanje

Bralec SuperUserja Kyle Cronin želi vedeti, ali so takšne tehnike elektronske obfuscation vredne težav:

Most of the time when I see someone post their email address online, especially if it’s a personal address, they use something like

me [at] example [dot] com

instead of the actual email address ([email protected]). Even top members of this community use similar styles in their profiles:

jt.superuser[AT]gmail[DOT]com

quixote dot su over yonder near that gmail place

The typical rationale is that this kind of obfuscation prevents the email address from being automatically recognized and harvested by spammers. In an age where spammers can beat all but the most diabolical captchas, is this really true? And given how effective modern spam filters are, does it really matter if your email address is harvested?

Glede na to, da je zaskrbljujoče za dejansko ljudi, s katerimi poskušate komunicirati (in potencialno ne preveč težav za bobnarje, ki jih želite izogniti), je vredno kopati globlje, da bi ugotovili, ali so tehnike resnično učinkovite.

Odgovor

Akira, ki prispeva SuperUser, ponuja študijo o tem, da podpira uporabo obfuscation:

Some time ago I stumbled upon the post of someone who created a honeypot and waited for differently obsfucated email-addresses coming back:

Nine ways to obfuscate e-mail addresses compare

CSS Codedirection 0 MB

moc.elpmaxe@zyx

Prikaz CSS: nič 0 MB

xyzfoo@example.com

Šifriranje ROT13 0 MB

[email protected]

Uporaba AT in DOT-ov 0,084 MB

xyz AT example DOT com

Stavba z Javascriptom 0,144 MB

var m = 'xyz'; // you can use any clever method of m += '@';

// creating the string containing the email m += 'example.com';

// and then add it to the DOM (eg, via $('.email).append(m); // jquery)

Zamenjava "@" in "." Z entiteti 1,6 MB

[email protected]

Razdelitev e-pošte s komentarji 7.1 MB

xyz@primercom ?> var13 ->

Urlencode 7,9 MB

xyz%40example.com

Golo besedilo 21 MB

[email protected]

To je izvirni statistični grafik, ki ga je pripravil Silvan Mühlemann, vsa njegova zasluga je:

Torej, odgovoriti na vprašanje: Da, (na nek način) dela obsevanja elektronov.
Torej, odgovoriti na vprašanje: Da, (na nek način) dela obsevanja elektronov.

Prispevek ak86 tehta v, pri čemer ugotavlja, da karkoli ste pridobili skozi obfuscation ste izgubili zaradi neprijetnosti za sebe in vašega sogovornika:

There was an interesting article by Cory Doctorow recently on this subject here which argued that email obfuscation doesn’t serve much purpose, and a more optimal approach is intelligently managing the spam you get. TL;DR version:

  • The objective of this entire exercise is not to reduce the amount of spam you get in your email, but the amount of spam you manually have to remove from your inbox.
  • Email obfuscation is a constant battle to come up with ever sophisticated bot-proof, human-readable encoding, and is a drain on the productivity of both the creator, and the correspondent.
  • “Almost any email address that you use for any length of time eventually becomes widely enough known that you should assume all the spammers have it.”
  • “The convenience of stable, easily copy-pastable email addresses” wins over trying to hide from the spambots.

Imate kaj dodati k razlagi? Zvok v komentarjih. Želite prebrati več odgovorov od drugih uporabniških članov stack Exchange? Oglejte si celotno temo za razpravo tukaj.

Priporočena: